Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 N.J. 569 - Boyle v. Breme

Boyle v. Breme’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2000

14 state decisions

80198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. · Bridges v. United States · Gagne v. Bertran · Newmark v. Gimbel's Incorporated · Lyon v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause of the lack of control exerted by the employer over the medical and patient-treating aspects of a house physician’s work, the independence ascribed to the medical profession, and the degree of skill, care and judgment associated with the practice of medicine, the house physician, when treating other employees, cannot be viewed simply as a servant in a master-servant relationship. [Id. at 574, 461 A.2d 1164 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The relationship between an employer and a company physician differs substantially from other employer-employee relationships to which the doctrine of master/servant would apply. Rather than directing and supervising the doctor's work, the employer lacks control over the medical, patient-treating aspects of its house physician's work.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Employees who are professionals owe a special duty to abide not only by federal and state law, but also by the recognized codes of ethics of their professions. That duty may oblige them to decline to perform acts required by their employers. [ Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 84 N.J. 58 (1980).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.