Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 N.M. 248 - State v. Turkal

State v. Turkal’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably United States v. Whitten (1983), State v. Cordova (1989)

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

19019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Stanley v. Georgia · Marron v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because of the knowledge personal to the juvenile informant, and by a reading of the affidavit as a whole, the juvenile’s veracity is shown by the reliability of the information which she provided. The in-' formation supplied by the juvenile relating to defendant’s furnishing drugs to teenagers was corroborated by the information supplied by the confidential informant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.