Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 N.M. 35

In re Rickard

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1979

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1979-02-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2022

19 state decisions

130197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

¶2FINAL JUDGMENT

¶3THIS MATTER came on for hearing before the full Court upon the report and recommendations of the Disciplinary Board and the record of the Hearing Committee which considered the matter. The Disciplinary Board was represented by William W. Gilbert, Santa Fe, its Chief Counsel, and the respondent was represented by Bruce G. Stafford, Albuquerque. The Court having heard the presentations of counsel and having considered the record and being fully advised,

¶4FINDS that the respondent, Robert R. Rickard, is guilty of unprofessional conduct involving fraud upon his insurance company in excess of $2,500.00 (a third degree felony) and surrounding circumstances all in violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6) and § 18-1-17, New Mexico Statutes 1953 annotated.

¶5NOW IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the respondent, Robert R. Rickard, be and he hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in all courts in the State of New Mexico, and that pursuant to the provisions of Rule 19(a), Rules Governing Discipline, he may not apply for reinstatement except upon special leave of this Court first obtained.

¶6IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Disciplinary Board have and recover its costs herein which are hereby assessed at $257.04.

/93/nm/35 · .json · Public domain