Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 N.M. 40 - Anderson v. MacKey

Anderson v. MacKey’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montano v. Saavedra · Yates v. Matthews · Corzine v. Sears, Roebuck and Company · Corzine v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all cases where the defendants deny that an alleged disability is a natural and direct result of the accident, the workman must establish that causal connection as a medical probability by expert medical testimony. No award of compensation shall be based on speculation or on expert testimony that as a medical possibility the causal connection exists.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[the expert] acknowledges that she does have pain and that she does have a psychological disability, and so far as I can find the record is totally silent as to even a fair inference from his testimony, that he’s saying that there is a causal connection. In fact, I think he just expresses no opinion as to the cause of the psychological disability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Q. And what is that disability, Doctor? A. I think she has a psychological disability. Q. And what is that psychological disability? A. Well, I am not properly — not properly trained — I am not trained in psychological diagnosis or psychology to put a name on it exactly, but it is some type of hysteria or conversion reaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.