State v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 1994
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Day · State v. Paris · 174 Cal. App. 2d 624 - People v. Caruso · United States v. Culotta · 23 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Kosanke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of such attempts by another is not admissible, however, where there is no evidence to connect the accused therewith. In order to make admissible evidence of attempts by a third person to influence a witness not to testify or to testify falsely, it must be established that such attempts were done by authorization of the accused .... [T]he authorization by the accused may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence and an inference may be sufficient to connect the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wortham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.