93 Ohio App. 289 - State. v. Kuchmak’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““If from the crime charged certain constituent parts may be chopped off, or removed, leaving the necessary ele ments of another complete crime, the latter is an included offense. Or to state it in another way, where the inferior offense is necessarily an elementary part of the greater offense, then the inferior or minor offense is included in the greater.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 39 Ala. App. 215 - Aiola v. State