93 Ohio App. 3d 127 - State v. Minkner’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a failure to give an instruction concerning a lesser included offense will not ordinarily constitute a manifest miscarriage of justice when the defendant has not requested such an instruction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]ecause of the strategic significance of a defendant's decision whether to present a jury with a possible intermediate result, or to leave the jury with an all-or-nothing proposition in the hope of an acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.