93 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
148 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 148 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 101 Ohio App. 3d 389 - State v. Clark (1995), 184 Ohio App. 3d 675 - State v. Pilgrim (2009)
148 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · Tibbs v. Florida · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 148 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“having control over a thing or substance, but may not be inferred solely from mere access to the thing or substance through ownership or occupation of the premises upon which the thing or substance is found.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Firearm' is defined in R.C. 2923.11 (B) as `any deadly weapon capable of expelling or propelling one or more projectiles by the action of an explosive or combustible propellant. `Firearm' includes an unloaded firearm, and any firearm which is inoperable but which can readily be rendered operable.' The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the firearm was operable or could readily have been rendered operable at the time of the offense. * * * {¶ 78}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In determining whether a given remark amounts to prosecutorial misconduct, an appellate court should consider the following elements: (1) the nature of the remarks; (2) whether an objection was made by defense counsel; (3) whether corrective instructions were given by the trial court; and (4) the strength of the evidence against the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.