93 Ohio App. 3d 653 - Gullia v. Gullia’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
92 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably 132 Ohio App. 3d 616 - Bowen v. Bowen (1999), 133 Ohio App. 3d 821 - Glick v. Glick (1999)
92 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · State v. Adams · Cherry v. Cherry · Kunkle v. Kunkle · Kaechele v. Kaechele
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination as to when to apply a valuation date other than the actual date of divorce is within the discretion of the trial court and cannot be disturbed on appeal absent a demonstration of an abuse of discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A review of the evidence shows that after the parties' separation, they had separate residences, separate business activities and utilized separate bank accounts. In addition, no attempt at reconciliation was made by either party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An abuse of discretion connotes more than an error of law or judgment, it implies that the trial court's attitude was unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.