93 Ohio App. 3d 686 - Kelm v. Kelm’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 139 Ohio App. 3d 772 - Buyer's First Realty, Inc. v. Cleveland Area Board of Realtors (2000), In Re Estate of Riley (2006)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center · Polikoff v. Adam · Stewart v. Midwestern Indemnity Co. · 59 Ohio St. 2d 65 - Bellaire City Schools Board of Education v. Paxton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment; (2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment; (3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial; (4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]rbitration actions qualify as special proceedings because arbitration was not recognized at common law or equity, and was legislatively provided for in R.C. Chapter 2711 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appeal may be taken from an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding or from judgment entered upon an award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.