Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 OHIOST3D 240 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

796
cited by 796 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 780 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 796 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez (2007), State v. Herring (2002)

2 federal appellate · 780 state decisions

3580200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Widner · 28 Ohio App. 2d 29 - State v. Pruett · 10 Ohio App. 3d 56 - State v. Sims · State v. Cornwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 796 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence must show that the defendant supported, assisted, encouraged, cooperated with, advised, or incited the principal in the commission of the crime, and that the defendant shared the criminal intent of the principal.”
    119 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall * * * [a]id or abet another in committing the offense.”
    63 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`Participation in criminal intent may be inferred from presence, companionship and conduct before and after the offense is committed.'”
    53 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.