State v. Issa’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1,122 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 1,132 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Barnes (2002), State v. Conway (2006)
1,122 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · State v. Bradley
Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Jackson v. Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial court has broad discretion in the admission of evidence, and unless it has clearly abused its discretion and the defendant has been materially prejudiced thereby, an appellate court should not disturb the decision of the trial court.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“After reviewing the entire record, weighing all the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and considering the credibility of the witnesses, we conclude that appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[i]n all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right * * * to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Issa v. Bradshaw · State v. Oliver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.