93 Or. App. 106 - State v. Prince’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"An affidavit supporting a search warrant is tested by much less rigorous standards than govern the admissibility or weight of evidence at trial. After-the-fact scrutiny by courts of the sufficiency of an affidavit should not take the form of de novo review. The issuing magistrate's determination of probable cause should be paid great deference by a reviewing court, and the resolution of doubtful or marginal cases should be largely determined by the preference to be accorded to warrants." State v. Prince, supra, 93 Or.App. at 112 , 760 P.2d 1356 . (Emphasis supplied; citations omitted.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 122 Or. App. 261 - State v. Russell

2. “an act which might appear innocent to a lay person may be incriminating when viewed by a trained and experienced police officer.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 122 Or. App. 261 - State v. Russell

3. “looking at the facts recited and the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from those.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 122 Or. App. 261 - State v. Russell