¶1 dissenting. It seems to me that the daughter took only a life estate and the grandchildren took as purchasers. They took, not as children of the daughter, but as grandchildren of the testator. I do not think the act of 1906 applies.
93 S.C. 213
76 S.E 468
Smith v. Smith
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 26, 1912
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1912-11-26
<p>Before SeasE, J., Colleton,</p> <p>Action by Perry G. Smith, administrator of Ann F. Murrell, against Owen H. Smith et al. Defendants appeal.</p> <p>cite: Intention of testator must govern in construction: 4 Kent. 535, 537; 6 Pet. 80; 36 la. 273; 30 Ency. 661, 663-4, 675, 685-6; 1 N. & McC. 69; 2 Bay 255; 2 Mill 346; Harp. Eq. 272; 9 Rich. Eq. 19; 1 Strob. 96; 1 D. E. S. 241; 2 D. E. S. 451; Riley Eq. 167; 4 McC. 151; 1 Hill Eq. 360; McM. Eq. 201; 12 Rich. Eq. 263; 26 S. C. 179; 26 S. C. 450; 27 S. C. 295; 29 S. C. 456; 30 S. C. 184; 36 S. C. 38; 26 S. C. 181. Devisee only took a life estate: 45 S. C. 590; 26 S. C. 454; 27 S. C. 297; 42 S. C. 342; 4 McC. Eq. 151; 29 S. C. 470; 42 S. C. 345; 4 McC. Eq. 151; 8 E. Ed. 322; 30 Ency. 687; 10 S. C. 428 ; Deed Eq. 162; 77 S. C. 454. Residuary clause: 56 N. C. 305; 82 S. C. 214. “Real” in second paragraph should not be made to read “personal:” 2 Jar. 80; 30 Ency. 691.</p> <p>cite: “Real” in second paragraph should read “personal:” 4 McC. 151; 1 D. E. S. 235; 74 S. C. 170. Construction of will as thus changed: 70 S. C. 62; 1 D. E. S. 243; 1 Hill’s Ch. 95; 10 S. C. 428; 24 Ency. 701; Deed Eq. 162; 29 S. C. 470; 30 Ency. 687; 77 S. C. 458; 8 E. R. A. 697; 3 Sup. Ct. R. 580; 2 Hill Ch. 490; 5 S. C. 459; 1 Jar. 339.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1912-11-26
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1955
1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →