Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 SO2D 863 - Barnes v. State

Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2017

15 state decisions

401957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pell v. State · Danford v. State · Tidwell v. State · In re Resch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled that `where the evidence is inconclusive or conflicting, the failure of the trial judge to provide a charge which lays down standards for the jury to follow under varying permissible views of the evidence constitutes reversible error.' Holley v. Kelley, Fla. 1957, 91 So.2d 862, 864 , and cases cited. Nor is there any legal principle more firmly established in our system of jurisprudence than that, which makes the jury the sole arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses (except where contrary to demonstrable physical facts) including the reasonableness, probability and credibility of the testimony of the defendant. Cf. Tidwell v. State, 143 Fla. 397 , 196 So. 837 . * * * * * * Regardless of how improbable the defendant's testimony was, it certainly was not demonstrably false, and as our Supreme Court did in the Barnes case, we must hold that the trial Court erred in refusing a self-defense instruction."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.