Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 So. 3d 360

Gridine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-05-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2015

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN GRAHAM V. FLORIDA 560 U.S. 48 , 130 S.Ct. 2011 , 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PROHIBIT SENTENCING A FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD TO A PRISON SENTENCE OF SEVENTY YEARS FOR THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE MURDER?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 175 So. 3d 672 - Shimeeka Daquiel Gridine v. State of Florida

Relies on Graham v. Florida

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*361On Motion for Kehearing and Certification

PER CURIAM.

¶2Having considered appellant’s motion for rehearing and certification, we deny the motion for rehearing but grant the motion to certify a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.

¶3We hereby certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

DOES THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISION IN Graham, v. Florida, — U.S.—, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), PROHIBIT SENTENCING A FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD TO A PRISON SENTENCE OF SEVENTY YEARS FOR THE CRIME OF ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE MURDER?
WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
/93/so3d/360 · .json · Public domain