Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

93 So. 3d 513

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-07-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on Davis v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-07-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Jonathan Bell timely appeals from his convictions for attempted second-degree murder, attempted robbery with a firearm, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm the convictions and sentences without discussion but remand with directions that the trial court correct an error in the judgment as it relates to the attempted robbery with a firearm conviction. As the State concedes, the judgment erroneously reflects conviction for a completed robbery with a firearm rather than an attempted robbery with a firearm. Bell is entitled to a judgment that correctly reflects the crimes for which he was convicted. Cf. Davis v. State, 529 So.2d 1251, 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

¶2AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF CORRECTED JUDGMENT.

ORFINGER, C.J., LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
/93/so3d/513 · .json · Public domain