Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 SW2D 460 - Kramer v. Sommers

Kramer v. Sommers’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2013

1 district · 7 state decisions

20193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMurry v. Stanley · Tilden v. . Green · International Travelers' Ass'n v. Branum · Globe Newspaper Co. v. Walker · Heidenheimer v. Bauman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The application filed in the county court was expressly authorized by the provisions of articles 3433, 3434, and 3435, and in article 3434 the executor or administrator is the only person named upon whom citation must be served. That was a special statutory procedure in which the executor was made the legal representative of all persons interested in the estate. * ⅜ And the proceeding being statutory, there is no basis for application of the common-law rule that all persons whose interests are to be affected must be made parties to the suit. It is therefore clear that there was no lack of necessary parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In proceedings under the provisions of the statutes invoked by appellant’s counsel, the Executor or Ad-minstrator with the will annexed is the only party required to be cited to answer the application of the plaintiff. Art. 1993. (Art. 3434). No provision is made for making any other person a party defendant.” (Parenthetical matter supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.