Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 TC 256 - Cassuto v. Commissioner

Cassuto v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Huffman v. Commissioner (1992), Powers v. Commissioner (1993)

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Relies on Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Golsen v. Commissioner · Golsen v. Commissioner · Arkansas Best Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Sher v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except to the extent it has waived its immunity, the Government is immune from claims for attorney's fees. Waivers of immunity must be 'construed strictly in favor of the sovereign,' and not '[enlarged] * * * beyond what the language requires.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall not be in excess of $ 75 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for such proceeding, justifies a higher rate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the prevailing hourly rate in an area is not a special factor to justify an increased rate under section 7430 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.