Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Tex. 406 - Garrett v. Robinson

Garrett v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 1966
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1966

22 state decisions

801900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the charge, one of two verdicts must have been rendered, viz.: (1) In favor of plaintiff Sam Robinson against defendants for the amount of the note sued on, and foreclosure of lien, if the note pleaded in set-off had been paid; (2) in favor of defendants against D. T. Robinson for the balance of the set-off, after deducting the amount of the note sued on, if the first-named note had not been paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “on the ground that the judgment of the court of civil appeals practically settled the cause, applicants stating that they could not show the facts held essential by that court to entitle them to enforce their claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.