Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 U.S. 664 - Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works

Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works’s Empirical Analysis

93 U.S. 664 · 1876

Citation profile

295
cited by 295 later decisions
36
cited 36 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

86 federal appellate · 28 district · 93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 295 later decisions (36 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005 · most notably United States v. Pink (1942), Fosdick v. Schall (1878)

86 federal appellate · 28 district · 93 state decisions — followed in 31 states

44018761880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. Van Buskirk · Black v. J. W. Zacharie & Co. · Murch v. Wright · Jennings v. Gage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 295 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was decided by this court in Green v. Van Buskirk, 5 Wall. (U. S.) 307, 18 L. Ed. 599 ; Id., 7 Wall. (U. S.) 139, 19 L. Ed. 100 , that the liability of property to be sold under legal process issuing from the courts of the state where it is situated must be determined by the law there, rather than of the jurisdiction where the owner lives. These decisions rest on the ground that every state- has the right to regulate the transfer of property within its limits.” ■”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “• “The court held ‘that it was a mere subterfuge to call this transaction a lease,’ and that it was a conditional sale, with the right of rescission on the part of the vendor, in case the purchaser should fail in payment of his installments. * * * It is true the instrument of conveyance purports to be a lease, and the sums stipulated to be paid are for rent; but this form was used to cover the real transaction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.