Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Wash. 2d 288 - State v. Pettitt

93 Wash. 2d 288 - State v. Pettitt’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
4
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably State v. Thorne (1996), 115 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Lewis (1990)

61 state decisions

22019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lovasco · Oyler v. Boles · 87 Wash. 2d 932 - State v. Lee · 91 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Gilcrist · 78 Wash. 2d 491 - State v. Jacobsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In our view, this fixed formula which requires a particular action in every case upon the happening of a specific series of events constitutes an abuse of the discretionary power lodged in the prosecuting attorney.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`decision to file criminal charges, with the awesome consequences it entails, requires consideration of a wide range of factors in addition to the strength of the Government's case, in order to determine whether prosecution would be in the public interest.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The discretion lodged in the office necessarily assumes that the prosecutor will exercise it after an analysis of all available relevant information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.