Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Wash. 2d 454 - State v. Dailey

93 Wash. 2d 454 - State v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
4
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad (1986), 120 Wash. 2d 822 - State v. Blackwell (1993)

60 state decisions

26019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 62 Wash. 2d 561 - Ferree v. Doric Co. · 87 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Burri · 86 Wash. 2d 200 - State v. Starrish · 7 Wash. App. 139 - Diel v. Beekman · 16 Wash. App. 603 - State v. Stamm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court on its own motion in the furtherance of justice, after notice and hearing, may dismiss any criminal prosecution and shall set forth its reasons in a written order.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] trial judge's oral decision is no more than a verbal expression of [its] informal opinion at that time. It is necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned. It has no final or binding effect, unless formally incorporated into the findings, conclusions, and judgment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “on its own motion in the furtherance of justice”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.