93 Wash. App. 520 - State v. Epler’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The fact that an appeal will not lie directly from an interlocutory order is not a sufficient basis for a writ of review if there is an adequate remedy by appeal from the final judgment.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of Seattle v. Keene · 143 Wash. 2d 651 - Commanda v. Cary

2. “[A] merely erroneous ruling is not an act in excess of the court's jurisdiction, and therefore no writ lies.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. City of Seattle v. Holifield · City of Seattle v. Keene

3. “Under the RALJ [Rules for Appeal of Decisions of the Courts of Limited Jurisdiction], an interlocutory order is reviewable on appeal from the ultimate judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 143 Wash. 2d 651 - Commanda v. Cary