93 Wash. App. 907 - State v. Tejada’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In its dispositional order, the court shall require the respondent to make restitution to any persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of the offense committed by the respondent. . . . The court may determine the amount, terms, and conditions of the restitution including a payment plan extending up to ten years if the court determines that the respondent does not have the means to make full restitution over a shorter period. ... For the purposes of this section, the respondent shall remain under the court’s jurisdiction for a maximum term of ten years after the respondent’s eighteenth birthday. Prior to the expiration of the ten-year period, the juvenile court may extend the judgment for the payment of restitution for an additional ten years.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re the Personal Restraint of Brady · 154 Wash. App. 189 - In Re Brady

2. “now automatically extended to age 28, when the court granted authority to further extend jurisdiction another 10 years.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 154 Wash. App. 189 - In Re Brady

3. “a strained and unrealistic interpretation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Walls