93 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Grady’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil (1984), 97 Ill. 2d 252 - People v. Williams (1983)
4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler · Fay v. People of State of New York Bove · Virginia v. Rives · Akins v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We agree with the Wisconsin Court of Appeals that `the test proposed by the California court is vague and uncertain, and severely limits the scope of peremptory challenges. If peremptory strikes can only be exercised in a certain way, dependent on circumstances, and subject to judicial scrutiny, they will no longer be peremptory. We refuse to undertake such an alteration of the very nature of the peremptory system.' State v. Grady (1979), 93 Wis.2d 1, 13 , 286 N.W.2d 607, 612 . * * *." ( 91 Ill. App.3d 99, 105 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“asportation ... is a transaction which continues beyond the point in time when the property of another is taken.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“With regard to the crime of larceny in particular, it is generally held that one may be guilty of larceny as a principal where the crime was incomplete until he contributed his aid in the asportation or taking possession of and removal of stolen property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.