Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 93 Wis. 2d 361 - State v. Schill

93 Wis. 2d 361 - State v. Schill’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 147 Wis. 2d 429 - State v. Spears (1988), 105 Wis. 2d 657 - State v. Johnson (1981)

26 state decisions

1401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · 54 Wis. 2d 370 - Peterson v. State · 57 Wis. 2d 543 - State v. Harper · 30 Wis. 2d 1 - State Ex Rel. Harvey v. Morgan · Pulaski v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The facts are undisputed that, at the time of the filing of the motion for postconviction relief, the defendant was no longer under sentence, nor in custody under the sentence of the state court. On the face of it, therefore, it appears indisputable that the circuit court had no juridsiction to entertain the petition for relief. “The result we reach here is admittedly pursuant to a rigid jurisdictional requirement, but it is one imposed upon the courts by the legislature. For jurisdiction, the prisoner must be in custody under the sentence of a state court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.