National Labor Relations Board v. Lake Holiday Associates, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
930 F.2d 1231 · 1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Boire v. Greyhound Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Res-Care, Inc. · Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board · Tuf-Flex Glass v. National Labor Relations Board · Fall River Savings Bank v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presents facts sufficient to support a prima facie showing of objectional conduct, that is, of misconduct sufficient to set aside the election under the substantive law of representation elections.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.