United States v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
930 F.2d 1368 · 1990
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Monroe (1991), United States v. Sitton (1992)
50 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Ohio v. Roberts · Mistretta v. United States · In re Disbarment of Sacco · Rita v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective; (2) one or more overt acts in furtherance of the illegal objective; and (3) the intent to commit the underlying substantive crime.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“establish when and by whom the documents were prepared.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“sentenced under a different legal regime,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.