Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 930 F.2d 773 - Picrin-Peron v. Rison

Picrin-Peron v. Rison’s Empirical Analysis

930 F.2d 773 · 1991

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Rosales-Garcia v. Holland (2003), Alvarez-Mendez v. Stock (1991)

27 federal appellate ·

3101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Fay v. Noia · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Stone v. Powell · United States v. W. T. Grant Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]bsent Picrin's reinvolvement with the criminal justice system, a change in the Cuban government enabling him to return to Cuba, or the willingness of a third country to accept him, he will be paroled for another year.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Habeas lies to enforce the right of personal liberty; when that right is denied and a person confined, the federal court has the power to release him. Indeed, it has no other power; it cannot revise the state court judgment; it can act only on the body of the petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Because he has been released, there is no further relief [that] we can provide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.