Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

930 F.2d 913

Docket No. 90-1167.

Raffaele v. Murdoch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 25, 1991. Decided April 19, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-04-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Andrews

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-04-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-88-1268-WN)

Christopher George Raffaele, appellant pro se.

William F. Howard, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Christopher George Raffaele appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985(3). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Raffaele v. Murdoch, CA-88-1268-WN (D.Md. Nov. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/930/f2d/913 · .json · Public domain