Oberdorf v. Amazon.Com. Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
930 F.3d 136 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Webb v. Zern · McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. · 97 Ill. 2d 195 - Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bars lawsuits seeking to hold a service provider liable for its exercise of a publisher's traditional editorial functions-such as deciding whether to publish, withdraw, postpone or alter content”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rely on Amazon's role as an actor in the sales process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.