Fox v. Amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
930 F.3d 415 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc. · Audi AG v. D'Amato · Kathleen Zwaan v. Honorable Alan K. Silberstein · Owens v. Truckstops of America · Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not choose to offer the [product] for sale, did not set the price of the [product], and did not make any representations about the safety or specifications of the [product] on its marketplace.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any individual regularly engaged in exercising sufficient control over a product in connection with its sale, lease, or bailment, for livelihood or gain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“individual [was] regularly engaged in exercising sufficient control over a product in connection with its sale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.