United States v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
930 F.3d 858 · 2019
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1852 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Payne v. Tennessee · Lewis v. United States · Barclay v. Florida · Wisconsin v. Mitchell · Dawson v. Delaware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court properly considered Mr. Schmidt's white supremacist ideas and hatred for the United States as evidence that he presents a threat of future dangerousness to the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Defendant's statements that he would 'continue to fight' and his view that it was 'fine to break the law' were highly relevant to the[] sentencing factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(cleaned up)); United States v. DeChristopher, 695 F.3d 1082, 1098 (10th Cir. 2012) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.