Wilkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We're given the opportunity of what we do is we look at all the circumstances involved. Mainly the criminal histories and pasts of the subjects that are involved, the propensity for violence, the propensity for fleeing, to execute in a no knock fashion, we're required by the Supreme Court, under the Fourth Amendment, to knock and announce our presence unless there's an exception to the knock and announce. One of the exceptions that we are afforded the opportunity is for the apprehension of peril, which is stating that if we can show or if we believe that there is a possibility of weapons inside of the house, a propensity for violence from the subjects that we're executing the search warrant on, that we can choose to not announce prior, and wait the appropriate amount of time prior to breaching the front door.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lacey v. State

2. “). Investigating officers obtained a search warrant for execution at Lacey's residence and compiled information for the Fort Wayne Emergency Services Team regarding the criminal histories of both Lacey and Wilkins. On December 5, 2008, the Fort Wayne Police Emergency Services Team arrived at the Pointe Center Cove residence to execute a search warrant directed toward evidence of illegal drugs and weapons.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lacey v. State

3. “warrant. Accordingly, we must decide whether the evidence obtained in the search should be excluded. The State urges that we follow Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586, 590 , 126 S.Ct. 2159 , 165 L.Ed.2d 56 (2006), which discussed the appropriateness of the exclusionary rule where a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lacey v. State