Donald v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
February 2023
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 50 Ohio App. 3d 56 - State v. Qualls · Woods v. State · 268 Pa. Super. 316 - Commonwealth v. Megella · 127 Ill. App. 3d 49 - People v. Davis · Baxter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“many of those due process rights guaranteed to probationers at probation revocation proceedings”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If at any time before the final submission of any criminal case to the court or the jury trying the case, the court has reasonable grounds for believing that the defendant lacks the ability to understand the proceedings and assist in the preparation of a defense, the court shall immediately fix a time for a hearing to determine whether the defendant has that ability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did not have a statutory right to a competency hearing because he was not standing for trial, but rather was participating in a probation revocation hearing, which is a matter that takes place after the final submission of a criminal case to the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.