Snyder v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Rosengren (2000), Glamann v. Kirk (2001)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Guin v. Ha · Stephan v. State · Montano v. Superior Court Pima County · Mallott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is a fundamental tenet of due process of law that a person accused of a crime has a right to attempt to obtain exculpatory evidence. And it is well established that law enforcement has a duty to preserve and disclose material evidence, the dereliction of which can deprive the accused of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person commits the crime of driving while intoxicated if the person operates or drives a motor vehicle ... (2) when, as determined by a chemical test taken within four hours after the alleged offense was committed, ... there is 0.10 grams or more of alcohol per 210 liters of the person's breath...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“a requested jury instruction should be given lies in the discretion of the trial court, However, the general rule is that the defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a defense theory if there is 'some evidence' to support it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Glamann v. Kirk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.