930 So. 2d 1095 - Wilde v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. · 620 So. 2d 811 - Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. · 693 So. 2d 1173 - Syrie v. Schilhab · 912 So. 2d 715 - Kinchen v. Louie Dabdoub Sell Cars, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery. Wilde v. Harrell, 05-CA-644 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/9/06), 930 So.2d 1095, 1097 , citing, Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-C-2512 (La.7/5/94), 639 So.2d 730, 751 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Facts are material if they potentially insure or preclude recovery, affect a litigant's ultimate success, or determine the outcome of the legal dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.