930 So. 2d 399 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Frazier v. Cupp · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State · United States v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he purpose of an indictment is to inform the criminal defendant “with some measure of certainty as to the nature of the charges brought against him so that he may have a reasonable opportunity to prepare an effective defense and to enable him to effectively assert his constitutional right against double jeopardy in the event of a future prosecution for the same offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State“failure to make a contemporaneous objection and allow the trial court opportunity to cure the defect is a procedural bar and constitutes a waiver of the argument on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“indictment . . . include . . . [t]he date and, if applicable, the time at which the offense was alleged to have been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gordon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.