930 So. 2d 44 - State v. Arceneaux’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Swint v. Chambers County Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he rule as to circumstantial evidence is: assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.