Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 930 So. 2d 44 - State v. Arceneaux

930 So. 2d 44 - State v. Arceneaux’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Swint v. Chambers County Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he rule as to circumstantial evidence is: assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.