930 So. 2d 478 - Wildee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Ring v. Arizona · Jones v. United States · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Issac v. State“prior convictions are a recognized exception to the requirement of jury determination of enhancing sentencing factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Issac v. State“he was entitled to have a jury determine whether he should be sentenced as a habitual offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Issac v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.