930 So. 2d 734 - Marr v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 542 So. 2d 1327 - Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega · Bryant v. State · 693 So. 2d 659 - Boyhan v. Maguire · Pelton v. Singletary · 608 So. 2d 80 - Applewhite v. SHEEN FINANCIAL RESOURCES
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Upon application of a party, the court shall vacate an award when: (a) The award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means. (b) There was evident partiality by an arbitrator appointed as a neutral or corruption in any of the arbitrators or umpire or misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party. (c) The arbitrators or the umpire in the course of his or her jurisdiction exceeded their powers. (d) The arbitrators or the umpire in the course of her or his jurisdiction refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefore or refused to hear evidence material to the controversy or otherwise so conducted the hearing, contrary to the provisions of s. 682.06, as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party. (e) There was no agreement or provision for arbitration subject to this law, unless the matter was determined in proceedings under s. 682.03 and unless the party participated in the arbitration hearing without raising an objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Regalado v. Cabezas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.