930 So. 2d 794 - Murphy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We note, however, that had Reed's motion been facially sufficient, we would have been compelled to reverse the trial court's order because the attachments to the order do not refute Reed's claim. Without an attached signed plea agreement or the transcript of the plea colloquy showing that Reed had stipulated to the jail credit, the trial court's order and its attachments are insufficient to refute Reed's claim to additional jail credit. Although we do not decide the issue at this time, we also note that when a claim of this nature is raised, the court records must establish the defendant's clear intent to waive a portion of his or her accrued jail time before we could affirm a defendant's stipulation to credit for less jail time than was actually served. It seems to this court that a defendant should not lose credit for jail time actually served due to a mistake by the defendant, defense counsel, or the State.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Davis v. State

2. “jail credit claims are [also] cognizable in motions filed pursuant to rule 3.850.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hagan v. State

3. “clear and knowing waiver of entitlement to additional jail credit”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hagan v. State