Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 930 SW2D 230 - Burke v. State

Burke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 174th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Prenzler v. Kleinman · Huffman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]hould you believe by a preponderance of the evidence that the State of Texas had the capacity to preserve the destroyed or nonpreserved bicycle of the complainant, then you may infer that any subsequent analysis of that evidence would have produced a result favorable to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.