Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

930 S.W.2d 481

Dooley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-10-01

Decided 1996-10-01

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Petitioner Dooley appeals from the trial court’s denial of his “NUNC PRO TUNC MOTION TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS SUBMITTED IN CASE NUMBER CR186-1508FX.” The trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/930/sw2d/481 · .json · Public domain