Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 930 SW2D 575 - Vineyard v. Hood

Vineyard v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2017

8 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson · Lehr v. Robertson · May v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]othing herein shall be construed to authorize a putative father to legitimate a child or to execute any voluntary acknowledgment of paternity without the consent of the mother of such child”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]othing herein shall be construed to authorize a putative father to legitimate a child or to execute any voluntary acknowledgment of paternity without the consent of the mother of such child " (emphasis added). In 1996, the Tennessee Court of Appeals held that requiring consent of the mother was constitutionally invalid. In re Hood, 930 S.W.2d 575, 580 (Tenn.Ct.App.1996) ("[W]e hold unconstitutional that part of T.C.A. § 36-2-202(c) which purports to disallow a putative father from attempting to legitimate his child without the mother's consent, on both due process and equal protection grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re CKG

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.