Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 930 S.W.2d 898 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2019

11 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 248th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Almanza v. State · Hernandez v. State · DeGarmo v. Texas · McKelvy v. Barber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a defense to prosecution that the actor through mistake formed a reasonable belief about a matter of fact if his mistaken belief negated the kind of culpability required for commission of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.