Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 931 F.2d 620 - Wright v. Holm

Wright v. Holm’s Empirical Analysis

931 F.2d 620 · 1991

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 26 663 74447 Allegheny International Inc (1992), Re: Dwight Lundell (2000)

11 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

720199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502

Relies on PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc. · County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. · Anderson-Walker Industries, Inc. v. Lafayette Metals, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “show facts tending to defeat the claim by probative force equal to that of the allegations of the proofs of claim themselves.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “initial burden of proof to demonstrate facts tending to demonstrate [that the claim included unmatured interest excluded from allowable claims under 11 U.S.C. S 502(b)(2)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We review independently the bankruptcy court's decision because we are in as good a position as the district court to review the bankruptcy court's findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.