United States v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
931 F.2d 65 · 1991
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. Saro (1994), Harris v. State (1993)
39 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · United States v. Young · United States v. Frady · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a bona fide need for the testimony; (2) the substance of the testimony; (3) the exculpatory nature and effect of the testimony; and (4) the likelihood that the co-defendant will testify if the cases are severed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`there is a danger that the jury will unjustifiably infer that this conflict alone demonstrates that both are guilty'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f it appears that a defendant ... is prejudiced by a joinder of ... defendants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.