Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 931 F.2d 675 - B-B Company v. Piper Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated

B-B Company v. Piper Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

931 F.2d 675 · 1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Robert W. Anderson House-Wrecking & Excavating, Inc. v. Board of Trustees · Rialto Theatre, Inc. v. Commonwealth Theatres, Inc. · Mad River Boat Trips, Inc. v. Jackson Hole Whitewater, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A condition precedent is defined as an act or event, other than a lapse of time, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance of a promise arises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Non-occurrence of a condition precedent discharges the other party's duty of performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.